Journal article
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2024
APA
Click to copy
Youngman, T., Modrow, S., & Meth, I. (2024). Deceiving Dichotomies: On the Interrelation of the Archive and the Cultural Memory Canon. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology.
Chicago/Turabian
Click to copy
Youngman, Tyler, Sebastian Modrow, and Isaac Meth. “Deceiving Dichotomies: On the Interrelation of the Archive and the Cultural Memory Canon.” Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology (2024).
MLA
Click to copy
Youngman, Tyler, et al. “Deceiving Dichotomies: On the Interrelation of the Archive and the Cultural Memory Canon.” Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2024.
BibTeX Click to copy
@article{tyler2024a,
title = {Deceiving Dichotomies: On the Interrelation of the Archive and the Cultural Memory Canon},
year = {2024},
journal = {Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology},
author = {Youngman, Tyler and Modrow, Sebastian and Meth, Isaac}
}
This paper explores the conceptual relationship between archives and canonization by amending Aleida Assmann's cultural memory framework of Canon and Archive to consider ongoing debates in archival theory and practice. The process of canonization concerns the selection, value, and duration of cultural memory. The formation and function of archives are marked by processes of appraisal (record evaluation and selection), acquisition (record transfer), and preservation (record duration). Placing A. Assmann's framework in conversation with the informational frameworks of de Fremery and Buckland, we observe how at any given time (a past/present context), records (documents) are selected (perception) because of their value in signaling memories and community histories (affordances) while serving as a durable medium for restabilizing identities (use) across time (a present/future context).